I read an article in Maclean’s earlier this month and was truly
taken-a-back by the bold call for a housing meltdown. Interestingly, recently
in the Financial Post, columnist Andrew Coyne wrote a great article
encapsulating the sentiment around the media selling fear over facts. I find it
interesting how many articles have the bold “sky is falling” headlines however
if you read through the article, they typically point to a balanced market. I
guess balanced headlines don’t sell papers. Anyhow, take a read when you have a
minute and as always, feel free to use any of my email materials to forward to your clients, we’re here to help.
Hope you enjoy the rest of your day and week.
Harbingers of doom
Even by Maclean’s standards, the cover was alarming. “You’re
about to get burned,” screamed the headline, over a picture of a house that was
literally on fire. “Canada looks like the US before its devastating housing
crash — maybe even worse.” And the kicker, for those still hesitating: “Why
it’s officially time to panic.”
This last was doubtless something of a little in-joke. For my old colleagues at Canada’s newsweekly, it is always
time to panic, especially about house prices. The magazine’s editors inhabit a
world beset by all manner of hitherto undetected demons, from more expensive
groceries (“sudden shortages, riots over prices, the world food crisis is about
to hit home”) to insomnia (“the truth about a modern epidemic”).
But nothing, nothing frightens the magazine or, it is hoped, its readers, more than real estate. For years
Maclean’s has been shuddering in terror of the imminent collapse of the
Canadian housing market. From the relative calm of its late 2007 cover story
(“Buy? Sell? Panic?”), the magazine soon picked up signals of the coming
apocalypse. “House prices start to fall,” the magazine announced the following
summer. By autumn, with the world financial crisis in full swing, so was
Maclean’s. “Canada’s Looming Real Estate Crisis,” the cover shouted: “Why house
prices may soon fall through the floor.”
As the months wore on, and the cataclysm failed to arrive, Maclean’s remained ever hopeful of a real collapse.
But durned if prices, after a brief dip, resumed rising. By June 2008, a grumpy
Maclean’s was warning readers “Don’t believe the housing hype,” insisting there
are “plenty of signs that the Canadian housing market is still on some very
shaky ground,” even if “average home prices are up more than 16 per cent this year.”
Fast forward through several more stories in the same vein and by this year the magazine and others were in even
less doubt: Canada was in a housing bubble. Why, just look at the numbers. For
starters, there’s the oft-repeated fact that Canadians are carrying debts worth
153% of their annual income. That’s true: but other countries’ citizens manage
much heavier debt loads, from the spendthrift Swiss (200%) to the feckless
Dutch (260%) to the profligate Danes (320%). We may be carrying almost as much
debt as the Americans before the crash, but with nothing like the same risk
factors, from subprime mortgages to small regional banks, that made their
economy such a firetrap. And if we’re mentioning how Canadians’ debts have
grown, we should surely also mention that their assets have as well: still five
times as large as their debts.
Mortgage costs, interests and principal combined, are currently running at about 30% of disposable income
— again, higher than a few years ago, but barely half what they were in the
early 1990s. Yes, house prices were still rising as of year-end, but more
slowly than before, as even the Maclean’s piece acknowledges — though somehow
it cites this as evidence for its doomsday thesis. But then, what doesn’t? If
prices were rising quickly, that would be proof of housing “mania.” If they
fell a little, that would be the bubble starting to burst. And if they fell a
lot? Look out below!
The truth is the real estate market is cooling slightly, helped by a modest
tightening of lending regulations. It’s true that a rise in interest rates from
current, historically low levels would put some homeowners in distress, but
they’d have to spike a long way before the damage grew widespread to full blown
panic. Andrew Coyne Apr10, 2012 –